Consulting Foresters: Review Land with a Site Viability Score
Use the Site Viability Score to help your client review the site before option talks move ahead. Add an independent screen to your advice. It is not a brokerage, engineering, utility or legal conclusion.
Power work asks where a site might connect. Place diligence adds local review, water, community facts and service capacity. It tests what else the project may need.
Patented neighborhood-level market geographies bring analog market modeling and community-readiness context alongside parcel-level viability where evidence supports it. Submarket saturation is a planning question, not a parcel-level finding. Coverage and geographic precision vary by location and source.
No commission. No brokerage. No appraisal.
The Site Viability Score
One site · one-time purchase
Give your client a modeled Site Viability Score and evidence on power, place, permits, community, water, climate and local service capacity. The report ranks issues for follow-up.
Add site evidence to your advice
Support your knowledge of the land with a focused screen of data-center site conditions.
Give clients one clear scorecard
Seven major site factors are summarized in a format you can review together.
Prepare the next conversation
Help the owner ask better questions before exclusivity or option terms advance.
Recognize specialist handoffs
See when the evidence points toward counsel, utility, engineering, or local verification.
Protect the trusted relationship
Bring in independent diligence without introducing another property representative.
Document source dates and gaps
Show clients what the public evidence supports and what remains unknown.
What we measure.
We bring public facts about power, water, climate, permit rules, community and local services into one early screen. A nearby asset is not proof that the place can serve the project.
Power facts without false certainty
Nearby lines, substations, RTO, queue, and upgrade facts are inputs—not proof of headroom, deliverability, or an approved interconnection.
What needs attention first
A consistent read on which site factors deserve the next question.
Water context
An early view of water stress and the site's underlying water conditions.
When sound review may matter
A signal that specialized acoustic review may be useful—not a sound model or setback determination.
Current evidence and honest gaps
Sources are dated where available, and missing evidence is never treated as proof that no issue exists.
A score built for an early decision
A concise, site-specific modeled result that can be shared with the advisers already involved.
A forester and landowner's perspective
“As a private landowner in the timber business, we found this report to be an extremely valuable tool in evaluating the potential of our property as a data center site. It provides a professional preliminary overview of the site's strengths and potential challenges, giving us valuable insight to guide our next steps and make more informed decisions about the future direction of our property.”
Disiere Forestry
Taylor Cardwell, CPCU, Forester
The independence boundary.
The landowner relationship stays yours. We do not broker the land or take a referral fee. The screen adds facts; it does not replace your client's legal or technical advisers.
Delivery & Coverage
Reports are prepared after complete site details are submitted and delivered as a PDF. Public-source gaps are shown as limitations rather than favorable assumptions. Private deeds, contracts, and unrecorded options are outside the screen.
What we do not do
We provide physical site evidence. We do not provide legal advice, appraisals, brokerage services, utility will-serve determinations, or predictions of developer behavior. We do not take commissions or referral fees from developers. Our only client is the evidence.