Skip to main content
For Land Brokers

Parcel-level viability · Patented neighborhood-level market geographies · Community analog evidence

Site Viability Score for Land Brokers

Show owners and buyers what may help, delay or stop a project. Get an independent site screen without another broker, a commission or an appraisal.

Power work builds the connection story. Place diligence adds local review, water, community facts and service capacity. These can affect both the project and the deal.

Patented neighborhood-level market geographies bring analog market modeling and community-readiness context alongside parcel-level viability where evidence supports it. Submarket saturation is a planning question, not a parcel-level finding. Coverage and geographic precision vary by location and source.

Screen a parcel — $495

No commission. No brokerage. No appraisal.

The Site Viability Score

$495 / site

One site · one-time purchase

A fast site screen combines power facts, our exclusive community analog model and ranked issues to review before the deal moves ahead.

Screen a parcel — $495
$2,500 for 10 sites

$250 per site. No expiration. Use credits as new opportunities arise.

Purchase 10-site pack
Sign in to view the watermarked sample

Qualify the opportunity earlier

Surface public site constraints before they become late-stage surprises.

Answer with a clear scorecard

Seven site factors give owners and prospective counterparties a consistent starting point.

Prepare for developer questions

Know which issues may arise when a serious site review begins.

Separate facts from open questions

See what public evidence supports and what still needs utility, engineering, legal, or local confirmation.

Strengthen your client advice

Add a specialized diligence layer without stepping outside your role.

Keep an evidence record

Source dates and coverage gaps make the screen easier to explain and share.

What we measure.

Power work asks where a site might connect. Our screen adds water, climate, permit rules, community facts and local service capacity. Use the same record to guide the next site review.

A note on retrospective research: The framework has been applied retrospectively to a limited documented sample of data center projects. This work is exploratory and descriptive; it is not validated predictive proof.

Power facts without false certainty

Nearby lines, substations, RTO, queue, and upgrade facts are inputs—not proof of headroom, deliverability, or an approved interconnection.

What needs attention first

A consistent read on which site factors deserve the next question.

Water context

An early view of water stress and the site's underlying water conditions.

When sound review may matter

A signal that specialized acoustic review may be useful—not a sound model or setback determination.

Current evidence and honest gaps

Sources are dated where available, and missing evidence is never treated as proof that no issue exists.

A score built for an early decision

A concise, site-specific modeled result that can be shared with the advisers already involved.

Independent Validation

Market interest did not influence the score.

When Carter Legacy Listings brought a Valley, AL industrial site to AI Data Center Impact for scoring, they mentioned a data center company had already submitted an LOI on the property—but that information played no role in the model’s evaluation. Scored purely on infrastructure, climate, power capacity, municipal permitting, regulatory, community readiness, and site fundamentals, the parcel came back ‘High Viability — 68/100,’ independently matching what the market had already concluded. The score wasn’t an echo of the deal—it was validation built from the ground up.

Scoring Result
High Viability
68 / 100
Independent of market interest

Client perspective

“As a private landowner in the timber business, we found this report to be an extremely valuable tool in evaluating the potential of our property as a data center site. It provides a professional preliminary overview of the site's strengths and potential challenges, giving us valuable insight to guide our next steps and make more informed decisions about the future direction of our property.”

Disiere Forestry

Taylor Cardwell, CPCU, Forester

Disiere Forestry logo

The independence boundary.

We do not list the land, solicit the owner, represent a buyer or share your commission. Bring the report into your client work. It is a tool, not another broker.

Delivery & Coverage

Reports are prepared after complete site details are submitted and delivered as a PDF. Public-source gaps are shown as limitations rather than favorable assumptions. Private deeds, contracts, and unrecorded options are outside the screen.

Screen a parcel — $495

What we do not do

We provide physical site evidence. We do not provide legal advice, appraisals, brokerage services, utility will-serve determinations, or predictions of developer behavior. We do not take commissions or referral fees from developers. Our only client is the evidence.