The research behind
the scores.
Original studies built on the same live signals the platform uses to score individual sites — published so you can see how the model holds up against the real world.
The Batch Zero Study
Every publicly announced Texas AI data center project, scored against the three-part standard for state cooperation: prove it's real, prove community impact is addressed, prove you can execute. See which projects clear the bar — and which quietly won't.
Read the Batch Zero analysis →Data Center Outcomes Analysis
What actually happens after a data center is announced? We tracked real project outcomes across U.S. counties — cancellations, delays, and completions — and measured how community and site conditions separated the projects that got built from the ones that didn't.
Explore the outcomes analysis →TX Exposure Map
All 254 Texas counties scored across five risk signals — interconnection queue concentration, community readiness, water stress, legislative exposure, and grid & power proximity — rolled into one interactive exposure map. See where the risk layers stack before capital does.
Open the exposure map →County Sentiment Is Context. A Site Is a Decision.
Why background county conditions are useful, but project diligence must resolve the people, institutions, service capacity, and approval path around a proposed coordinate.
Read the county-versus-site thesis →