Skip to main content
Research

Data Center Research:
the scores.

These original studies use the same live signals as our site screens. Read the methods, results and limits to see how the model holds up in real cases.

Site Database Study

The Batch Zero Study

Review announced Texas projects in our live database. The study uses three checks: is the project real, has community impact been addressed, and can the team execute? Read the method and limits before using a result.

Read the Batch Zero analysis
Outcomes Research

Data Center Outcomes Analysis

What changes after a data center opens? Compare jobs and tax measures in host counties with matched counties. Read how the counties were chosen, where data is missing, and what the estimates can and cannot show.

Explore the outcomes analysis
County Exposure Map

TX Exposure Map

Explore all 254 Texas counties on one map. Compare grid queues, community readiness, water stress, state rules and nearby power assets. These county signals help set priorities; they do not prove a parcel has power or permission to build.

Open the exposure map
Diligence Methodology

County Sentiment Is Context. A Site Is a Decision.

Why background county conditions are useful, but project diligence must resolve the people, institutions, service capacity, and approval path around a proposed coordinate.

Read the county-versus-site thesis

Ready to test a specific site?

Move from published research to coordinate-level place diligence for your parcel.

Score a Site

Already have an account? Sign in

Practical site-screening guides

Compare ClimateCheck with site-screening, land-search and operational tools. Match each tool to the question it can answer.

Read the ClimateCheck alternatives buying guide

Before a capital commitment, review project-specific community concerns, the decision path and unresolved evidence gaps.

Read the pre-capital Community Fit guide

Compare water stress, grid context and local regulatory exposure across candidate sites, with sources and unknowns visible.

Compare data center screening tools for grid, water and community evidence. Review each vendor’s published scope, sources and limits rather than treating the tools as interchangeable.

Distinguish GRESB sustainability assessment from candidate-site screening, and choose the evidence and deliverable your decision requires.